[MD] SQ is the illusion

[MarshaV]

Ron,

yes               this morning i am loving you        ...   


Marsha 



On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:45 PM, X Acto wrote:

> static quality is what we mean when we say we know stuff










> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com>
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Sent: Sun, August 29, 2010 11:49:52 AM
> Subject: [MD] SQ is the illusion
> 
> People talk about DQ like its so mysterious and ineffable, but really it's
> SQ that's completely incomprehensible and mysterious.  Nothing is really
> static, but it all seems like it is in the moment.  What's up with that?
> Underlying substance is more unreal than real.  Patterns only exist in a
> constantly shifting cosmos, with everything always in flux from moment to
> moment.  Static?  What's static?
> 
> According to Magnus, the one and zeros of a machine.  The cold, rational
> precision of logic.  That is, our own rational systems. But these are
> unreal.  The real world pulls plugs, zaps with cosmic rays and turns to rust
> in time.
> 
> Meanwhile, the ongoing Quality which causes us to create the world in our
> heads, it's so plain and obvious and unchanging.  So unmysterious and
> evident.
> 
> But everybody wants to believe that  SQ exists.  They want to feel that
> reality is  stable.  Even though we know it's not.  What is it with you
> people and your static cling?


 
___