[MD] Able to change well.

[MarshaV]

Ade,

Within the MoQ all that we 'know' is static patterns.  Whether 
Jung's archetypes, or Einstein's special relativity, it is static 
pattern(s) of value.

Marsha 
 




On Sep 3, 2010, at 4:01 PM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> On Sep 3, 2010, at 3:19 PM, schoadabyool at talktalk.net wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Ade,
>> 
>> Archetypes are static patterns of value too.
>> 
>> 
>> @ Hello Marsha,
>> Archetypes are potential. I'm open to possibilities but i would have to give quite a bit of consideration as to how potential is a static pattern.
>> Help me.
> 
> 
> Hi Ade,
> 
> I take it you are meaning they are potential in an 
> individual.  If so, the a static pattern event would 
> be a potential in a individual based in their past 
> experience (memory) with a pattern.  
> 
> Doesn't that make sense?  
> 
> 
> Marsha 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> 
>> As far as archetypes go, I like the Myers-Briggs system of archetypes better than Jung's, but they do have a relationship.
>> 
>> 
>> @ I think this may be a misunderstanding on your part. Archetypes are not personality traits.
>> 
>> 
>> Do you have a quote or url where Jung seems to supports Bo's acronym?   
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> @ My information is taken from the Collected works of C.G. Jung.
>> I can try to give you page references.
>> By the way, i think there is a limit to the number of posts that mention certain topics, and i don't want to be drawn over my quota.
>> Thank you
>> Ade
>> 
>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> 
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___