[MD] Able to change well.

[Krimel]

> [Marsha]
> Archetypes are static patterns of value too.  As far as archetypes go, I
> like the Myers-Briggs 
> system of archetypes better than Jung's, but they do have a relationship.

> 
> Do you have a quote or url where Jung seems to supports Bo's acronym?   
> 
> [Krimel]
> You do know that the Meyer-Briggs test is entirely based on the
personality
> dimensions Jung laid out in his book "Analytical Psychology", right? They
> have little to do with archetypes but both are Jung's.
 
[Marsha]
Okay, I was confusing personality types with archetypes.  I suppose I
jumped to that conclusion because of the mention of 'introverted'
being an important Myers-Briggs type factor.  

Oh right, the shadow(Wendy's sewing task), anima, animus & self.  
It's been a long time.  Sorry for confusion. 

Which Myers'-Briggs type are you? 

[Krimel]
Measuring such a thing as personality is like flipping coins, reading
entrails or claiming the swirling of old tea leaves is more or less
prophetic than swirling new ones. I paid little mind to whatever test
results I accumulated over the years. My personality type is whatever the
people who interact with "it" say "it" is. I would say "it" is the type that
either doesn't take tests or doesn't take them seriously when "it" does.
>From where I see "it"; "it" is a Shadow. Some have suggested we'd be happier
if I'd quit stitching "it".