[MD] Able to change well.

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

get medical attention, Bodrus.

2010/9/4 <schoadabyool at talktalk.net>

>
>
>
>
> Hi Ade
>
> schoadabyool at talktalk.net wrote:
> >Jung thinks a division between the psychic realm and that of pure emotion
> lead
> to intellectual development.
> >And this reminded me of Bodvar Skutvik's SOL.
>
> 1. There's a big leap from valuing a division to suggesting it's a whole
> new
> level. Especially since it demotes *any* written text to just inorganic
> ink, and
> the human brain to mere biology.
>
> 2. Since you understood the stack concept, you should realize that the S/O
> division only has value, actually only is real at all, in the human
> perspective
> stack. The S/O division is not transposable to any other stack, so it has
> little
> metaphysical value.
>
>  Magnus
>
>
> Hello Maguns,
> 1. There is as yet no division of evolutionary related levels you mention
> in Zen and...
> Zen and... does not deal with evolution.
> The division Jung recognises is a function which performs the task of
> multiplying symbols. If you truly believe this division
> is invented by Quality then i can't see a problem ascribing the emerging
> intellectual skill to Quality itself.
>
>
> 2. Lila uses a different set of opposites to that found in the previous
> book in order to explain evolution in terms of quality.
> It's author has stated in SODV that levels submerge subjects and objects. I
> don't think it's that easy.
> I think i get what you are saying, but the submerged subjects and objects
> are a division of the stack itself.
> So you're right and wrong at the same time.
> I think.
> Thank you
> Ade
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser