[MD] Able to change well.

[schoadabyool at talktalk.net]

> Ade,
> 
> Within the MoQ all that we 'know' is static patterns.  Whether 
> Jung's archetypes, or Einstein's special relativity, it is static 
> pattern(s) of value.
> 
> Marsha 
> 
> Hello Marsha,
> the structure of the unconscious is unknown.
> When the author of the moq says that its [moq] terms are arrived at 
dynamically, it is similar to saying moq terms are of the subconscious.
> Thank you


Ade,

Are you saying:  Static patterns of value as terms are below conscious???  


Marsha


Hello Marsha,
I'm suggesting all symbols emerge from the collective unconscious.
So those of the moq must also emerge from the collective unconscious.
Moq symbols currently have the names static and dynamic, but the symbols themselves are Archetypal, of the collective, and perhaps deeper and transcendental.
By transcendental i mean outside space and time.
If i understand correctly.
Anyone who believes transcendental harmony is in the same area it seems to me.


Let's go further, this is all Neoplatonism.
The quantum physicist David Bohm speaks of Implicate order to explain the more paradoxic formulations of quantum dynamics.
I think this is Neoplatonism too by the looks of it.
Have i cleared that up or made things worse?
Thank you
Ade