[MD] Able to change well.

[John Carl]

Adrie,

Ok first of all, you're really barking up the wrong tree, here Adrie.
Seeing ghosts in the machine.    Perhaps a little projection, eh?

Second, if Bo could write this well, he would have won a lot more friends.
Bo was stuck on a narrow range of verbiage that just didn't quite fit the
people he was addressing.  But Ade is making some damn fine points here and
you should pay closer attention to the content.

imho.

John



On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:36 PM, ADRIE KINTZIGER <parser666 at gmail.com>wrote:

> get medical attention, Bodrus.
>
> 2010/9/4 <schoadabyool at talktalk.net>
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi Ade
> >
> > schoadabyool at talktalk.net wrote:
> > >Jung thinks a division between the psychic realm and that of pure
> emotion
> > lead
> > to intellectual development.
> > >And this reminded me of Bodvar Skutvik's SOL.
> >
> > 1. There's a big leap from valuing a division to suggesting it's a whole
> > new
> > level. Especially since it demotes *any* written text to just inorganic
> > ink, and
> > the human brain to mere biology.
> >
> > 2. Since you understood the stack concept, you should realize that the
> S/O
> > division only has value, actually only is real at all, in the human
> > perspective
> > stack. The S/O division is not transposable to any other stack, so it has
> > little
> > metaphysical value.
> >
> >  Magnus
> >
> >
> > Hello Maguns,
> > 1. There is as yet no division of evolutionary related levels you mention
> > in Zen and...
> > Zen and... does not deal with evolution.
> > The division Jung recognises is a function which performs the task of
> > multiplying symbols. If you truly believe this division
> > is invented by Quality then i can't see a problem ascribing the emerging
> > intellectual skill to Quality itself.
> >
> >
> > 2. Lila uses a different set of opposites to that found in the previous
> > book in order to explain evolution in terms of quality.
> > It's author has stated in SODV that levels submerge subjects and objects.
> I
> > don't think it's that easy.
> > I think i get what you are saying, but the submerged subjects and objects
> > are a division of the stack itself.
> > So you're right and wrong at the same time.
> > I think.
> > Thank you
> > Ade
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> parser
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>