[MD] Limits of Science

[Ian Glendinning]

Marsha,

Emphasizing that a named person could do with some enlightenment IS a
personal attack.

But since I genuinely believe you do get it, I'm pretty sure it was accidental.
As I said take care (smiley) :-)
Ian

On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:20 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> Ian,
>
> The exclamation mark was meant to emphasize what I think is important.
> Calling you an idiot would be a personal attack.  I don't think you are an
> idiot, and didn't call you any such name.
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
> On Sep 12, 2010, at 6:16 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
>
>> Marsha there you go again with the (accidental - I hope) personal attacks.
>>
>> Aimed explicitly at me "And a little enlightenment would help
>> (exclamation mark) !".
>>
>> Take care ;-)
>> Ian
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 11:09 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sep 12, 2010, at 5:56 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
>>>
>>>> But therein lies the rub Marsha.
>>>>
>>>> GOF / Classical / Official / Methodical science may believe it is
>>>> incapabale of making value judgements .... but the reality of science
>>>> - scientists being people - involves as many value judgements as any
>>>> other walk of life.
>>>>
>>>> This is Maxwell's "Scientific Neurosis".
>>>>
>>>> The two sides need integration (a la Parker-Follett) not division and
>>>> reinforcement (eg by better definitions).
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>
>>>
>>> And some enlightenment would do the trick!   But I believe a new
>>> level with an enlightened point-of-view is necessary.  imho.  - Marsha
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 10:43 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 12, 2010, at 5:28 AM, Ian Glendinning wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> http://science.howstuffworks.com/innovation/scientific-method10.htm
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Enjoy
>>>>>> Ian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> "Science is also incapable of making value judgments."
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ___
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>>> Archives:
>>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>>>
>>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>>> Archives:
>>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>>
>>>
>>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>>> Archives:
>>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>