[MD] Where I'm at [Administrator Message]

[MarshaV]

On Sep 13, 2010, at 12:02 PM, david buchanan wrote:

> 
> Marsha said to Horse: 
> 
> Having been on the receiving end of one of dmb's trashy little posts full of insults, I was a bit sensitive to the tactic.  But I get your message loud and clear.  It won't happen again on my part.
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> 
> If my purpose were merely to insult, the so-called "tactic" of sending a private message to one person rather than to the whole group would be counterproductive in the extreme. If my purpose were merely to shame or bully, it would be far more effective to do the insulting in front of as many people as possible. That's why politicians put their attack ads on TV - at great expense.  And that's why you "needed" to take my private post and make it public. Somehow, by your calculations, you imagined this would embarrass me. It doesn't. But if I were John, I wouldn't be too happy about it. You dished up the embarrassment that I was trying to spare him.
> 
> I think this little episode says a whole lot about where you're at, Marsha. This behavior only shows that your heart is full of vengeance and spite. The reason is obvious; I'm very critical of your position on the MOQ and of your evasive style and you don't like it. Rather than respond to the actual criticisms, you'll just do sleazy stuff like this. Dropping the "F" bomb, playing the (mixed-up) tattle-tale and declaring your intellectual autonomy and your intention to ignore me are just more of the same. Altogether, it's just one big temper tantrum. I doubt that anyone is going to take you or your position more seriously because of it. 


Marsha says:
I don't think you can speak for ALL anything, and personally having read what you wrote think it says volumes about you.  I don't like to discuss issues with you because of your propensity to fall into the name-calling mode when you don't get agreement.   But I've had enough.   

You may continue this thread without me, because I am going back to refusing to participate in a discussion with you.  I wish you well, of course.  





> 
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> On Sep 13, 2010, at 10:42 AM, Horse wrote:
>> 
>>> [Message from MD Administrator]
>>> 
>>> I agree completely with Adrie here.
>>> Emails that are sent off-list should remain off-list.
>>> If they are to be posted to the list then ALL participants should agree to their being published on MD AND they should run it past me first.
>>> If there is some particular reason that you feel something should be be brought from the private to the public domain (threats or whatever) then please contact me with your concerns.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Horse
>>> 
>>> 
>>>>> And i strongly dissaprove the usage for unclear purposes of list-ommitted
>>>>> mails.
>>>>> Mails that are meant to be kept confidential, have no right of existence in
>>>>> the public domain.This is unnaceptable.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'v stayed away from the conflict DMB, Jc,i try to keep my options open as
>>>>> long as possible.try to settle the conflict Jc, without cheap
>>>>> use of relaying mails in the public domain.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Adrie
> 		 	   		  
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html


 
___