[MD] Philosophy is dead

[ADRIE KINTZIGER]

Hi Andre, i agree on your abstraction.

Allow me to respond to some conciderations.

I will take a leap to show that time is conceptual.

suppose we arrive at the exact formulation of the time event.
We are there , finally, we see the mechanism, it is there , the
equasion--finally, now next question derived from this
eureka moment,.....What is the duration of time.? and here we go again.

we simply don't know , because we cannot know , it will give birth to the
next question if we do,....DQ?
pattern of value? yep, the dynamical caracter of everything of the Giant,
every last bit of it.
Adrie



2010/9/18 Andre Broersen <andrebroersen at gmail.com>

>
>
> Craig:
>
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 2:25 PM,<craigerb at comcast.net>  wrote:
>
>  >  [Steve]
>>
>>  >>  It would seem that either at some point something came from nothing
>>> or
>>> >>  that something was always around. Which do you think it is?
>>>
>> >
>> >  Time is a sequence of changes&  time began with the first change.
>> >  It is a moot point whether the first change was from nothing to
>> something or
>> >  from something to something else. ?Either way there was a beginning&
>> >  it was a finite time ago.
>>
> I think that is a good way to dissolve the issue.
>
> Andre:
> The Buddha (wisely) was silent when asked about 'beginnings'. I imagine
> acres of forests have been
> chopped to fill books with speculations. We simply do not know.
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>



-- 
parser