[MD] Intellectual Level

[X Acto]

it doesent work for me because it comes with its own set of particular
consequences that I feel are of low quality.



----- Original Message ----
From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
Sent: Sat, September 18, 2010 9:00:55 PM
Subject: Re: [MD] Intellectual Level


On Sep 18, 2010, at 8:39 PM, X Acto wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> Marsha asks:
> How are feelings, passions and other modes of consciousness included back into 

> rationality?  How are they included back into science?  How are then included 
> back into mathematics?  How?
> 
> 
> Ron:
> By understanding truth to be an intellectual value. Often those equations that 

> explain phenomena best
> are the most beautiful, they are chosen for their aesthetic as well as 
> functionality in explanation to make
> them what we mean when we say they are the best explanations.
> 
> that can mean 2+2 may equal 5 if the value of 2 is high enough.
> 



Marsha:
From my point-of-view there is an emerging level where value is known as 
primary, 

and fourth-level, intellectual patterns as tools are used for creating and 
implementing 

a higher quality experience/environment.  Where one "can then examine 
intellectual 

realities the same way one examines paintings in an art gallery, not with an 
effort to 

find out which one is the 'real' painting, but simply to enjoy and keep those 
that are 

of value. There are many sets of intellectual reality in existence and we can 
perceive 

some to have more quality than others, but that we do so is, in part, the result 
of our 

history and current patterns of values."

This works for me; it doesn't work for you that is okay by me.  


___


Moq_Discuss mailing list
Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
Archives:
http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
http://moq.org/md/archives.html