[MD] [Bulk] Re: Intellectual Level

[MarshaV]

On Sep 19, 2010, at 6:39 AM, Andre Broersen wrote:

> Marsha to Andre:
> 
> My questions specifically were how are feelings, passions and other modes of consciousness
> included back into rationality as dmb suggested?   How are they included back into science?
> How are they included back into mathematics?  How?
> 
> Andre:
> Without wanting to be a smart-arse Marsha, I think that the MOQ is asking (and answering) the
> points you raise. It specifically asks how on earth it has been possible to exclude them. ZMM
> and LILA have adequately answered these, as dmb has pointed out to you by giving you relevant
> passages.


What you think is adequate means nothing to me, especially since dmb never quoted LILA.   




> 
> Our consciousness functions through them and through our consciousness they function. The test
> of the quality of this functioning lies in direct experience. This is, as far as I understand it,
> what the radical empiricist argues and offers.
> 
> Marsha:
> I guess maybe I should thank you, Adrie and Ron for standing in for the philosophologist.
> 
> Andre:
> If you are this unsure about it, don't do it. And your further addition is uncalled for.




 
___