[MD] Intellectual Level
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Sun Sep 19 09:00:21 PDT 2010
On Sep 19, 2010, at 11:18 AM, plattholden at gmail.com wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2010 at 10:20, MarshaV wrote:
>
>
> Ron, Andre, Adrie, (Ronettes),
>
> I am finished with this for now, and will stick
> to my own definition/interpretation as a more
> meaningful description of intellectual
> static patterns of value. More meaningful
> for me, which is appropriate to my own
> experience.
>
> Hi Marsha,
>
> Funny thing happened on the way to defining the intellectual level. Almost
> everyone agrees, including Pirsig, that intellectual patterns originate out of
> society. The same people then try to squeeze the MOQ into the intellectual
> level, but what society did the MOQ originate from? None.
>
> The MOQ originated in response to Dynamic qualty by the unique combination of
> value patterns named Robert M. Pirsig. Some may try to say he is society. Yeah,
> right. He is no more society than the brujo was. The values that matter, the
> ones that change society, originate out of individuals, defined as being all
> four static value levels plus the ability to respond to DQ.
>
> An argument will be that Pirsig, the brujo and other innovators originate out
> of society. True enough. But new value patterns originate from individuals
> only. That's why Pirsig wrote that you shouldn't execute criminals unless they
> are a threat to society. One of them might have an idea that would move the
> evolution of life forward.
>
> In fact when you think about it, individuals don't fit in any of the levels.
> They're a separate category all their own.
>
> Platt
Hi Platt,
Certainly dynamic individuals like Mr. Pirsig are a separate category. I agree,
I agree, I agree.
Marsha
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list