[MD] Constant
118
ununoctiums at gmail.com
Sun Sep 19 10:48:26 PDT 2010
Hey Andrie,
yea, maybe Frankensteinsaurus physiks. I don't pretend to be an expert in
quantum. I was trained in bioelectrochemistry at Imperial College in
London, and have an affinity for that. I certainly did not mean that
physics was simple, far from it, it just doesn't explain much of what I
experience, Quality for example. And no, I do not drink, but often feel
drunk. Go figure.
Cheers,
Mark
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 5:38 AM, ADRIE KINTZIGER <parser666 at gmail.com>wrote:
> Well , i was reading this, and i think i can label it as the birth of a new
> Frankensteinosaurus
> physiks as a simplistic reality, ---best ever , have you been drinking ,
> dude?
>
> 2010/9/19 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com>
>
> > Hi All once again.
> >
> > I see that Marsha asked a question about the speed of light, which led to
> > an
> > interesting discussion on physics. Now physics is one of my favorite
> ways
> > of exploring the metaphysical and mystical. One must keep in mind that
> > physics can only deal with that which is measurable, and therefore
> creates
> > a
> > simplistic reality which may or may not reflect ones total experience.
> > But,
> > the modern constructs of physics certainly do lead to the mystical.
> >
> > So to start with, the current theory of the speed of light (of course as
> > science progresses theories are always replaced by new ones). The theory
> > extrapolates to a vacuum, or free space (or whatever you want to call it,
> > Nothing There). Of course this could well be impossible for if one takes
> > the particle view of the photon, once light is present there is no
> vacuum.
> > So, whatever. But, in this theory as I have just been reading on these
> > posts, there is a maximum to its speed. The way I have learned to
> > understand this is by switching the relative points and assuming that
> light
> > is stationary, and that we are traveling at its speed. This makes sense
> to
> > me because time is equal to zero at the speed of light (in other words
> the
> > photon is outside of time). So zero time, zero speed. I know, we can
> find
> > all sorts of trouble with this, but I have worked through a lot of it,
> and
> > it requires all sorts of imaginary dimensions and so forth. So the
> > question
> > is why are we moving so fast and creating time in the mean time, and why
> we
> > can't move any faster (that is, go slower than zero)? Well it would seem
> > that because of the nature of light which comes from all over the place,
> > there is really no direction to move in to move faster, so we are stuck
> at
> > this speed. We can of course slow down (currently seen as speeding up to
> > the speed of light), whatever that means in this crazy proposition. The
> > problem is that as we do so we do so we get incredibly big.
> >
> > But let's use current physics to explore the mystical. To do this we
> look
> > at gravity (since that seems where the previous dialogue went). Now,
> there
> > is a branch of physics that postulates the existence of the graviton. In
> > fact, it must exist according to some. The problem is that the graviton
> > can
> > never be measured, because it has no mass. So, since we can't measure
> it,
> > does that mean it doesn't exist? No of course not. Since theory
> predicts
> > it, it could well be hanging around. So what exactly does this graviton
> > do?
> > Well, it creates gravity. While we can never ever measure the graviton,
> we
> > can feel its affects. So, we can feel the effects of things that we will
> > never be able to measure. Happens all the time.
> >
> > The last thing I wanted to post about concerning the mystical
> > through contemplation of physics is the electromagnetic theory.
> > Electromagnetism is the primary force through which we physically
> interact
> > with reality. Now, this theory has been adopted into the quantum club.
> > So,
> > what can we meditate about our personal experience through the quantum
> > theory. Well, there is quantum stuff going on in our brains at every
> > moment. To simplify, this means that particles are moving from on place
> to
> > another without going the distance between. They kind of disappear and
> > reappear somewhere else. So where are they when they are not in between?
> > There is no doubt in my mind that they are on the "Other Side",
> something
> > the Doors sang about many years ago. So what is this other side?
> > Obviously
> > it dramatically impacts what we are aware of right now because our brains
> > are full of this quantum jumping. Now we are getting mystical.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > 118
> > aka Mark
> > aka WillBlake2
> > Moq_Discuss mailing list
> > Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> > Archives:
> > http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> > http://moq.org/md/archives.html
> >
>
>
>
> --
> parser
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list