Hi dmb I take it that is a typo in the final James quote ... "is" rather than "in" ? Your post despite the two large wiki quotes is a response to John - also quoted. I can't see what it says to John's point about the redundancy ( non pragmatism ) of multiverses / many worlds ? Ian On 24 Sep 2010, at 16:36, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote: >