[MD] Able to change well.

[Mary]

Hi Craig,

...and I'm not trying to be perverse, but this differs how?

Let's cut to the chase.  I could wait for you to reply that subjectivism is
not the same as 'subjects' etc.  And you would be right, but they are both
founded upon the same assumptions.  I.E., you cannot have 'subjectivism'
without presupposing subjects nor 'objectivism' without objects, capesche?

Why do I feel so strongly that Phaedrus would understand while the latter
day Pirsig would not?  Well, that's ok.  I've forgotten more than I remember
now too.

Best,
Mary



> [Mary]
> >   SODV is pandering to SOM.  I am mystified as to why he did it.
> 
> That's because of your fundamental misunderstanding:
> in SOM, S = Subject & O = Object
> 
> in the MoQ diagram of SODV, S = Subjective & O = Objective.
> 
> Craig
>