[MD] sq is not other than DQ

[MarshaV]

Re:  sq is not other than DQ


I'm no genius, but I understand this statement as a non-affirming negative.  It is inclusive.

The statement 'a forest is trees' allows for one to say:  Yes, and it is undergrowth, animals and insects too.  Where if you state that 'a forest is not other than trees' there is no allowance in the statement to point to other additional possibilities.  


So my statement is:   sq is not other than DQ.  -  The fundamental nature of sq is DQ.   


The statement precisely represents my understanding.
 
 
 
 
 
  

 
___