[MD] freewill
Dan Glover
daneglover at gmail.com
Fri Apr 1 21:43:36 PDT 2011
Hello everyone
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:40 AM, John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ho Dan,
>
> Sorry for the delays. Spring is here and I've less free time on my hands
> than olden days. I'll try and make it count.
>
> ("for a change", I hear you mutterin'...)
Hi John
Good of you to take the time.
>
>
>>
>> Dan:
>> If you have to choose to care, isn't that a definition of determinism?
>> You're saying you HAVE to do something in order to care. You are
>> setting up a predetermined precondition for caring!
>>
>>
>JohN
> You don't have to choose to care. But you can. It's an optional choice.
Dan:
But John, that isn't what you said:
John:
Me!
I noticed that freewill is Quality.
I've been saying it for some time now.
Has anybody noticed?
Ron noticed.
Does anybody care?
You have to choose...
to care.
Dan comments:
To the extent that we follow static quality, there is no choice. By
following Dynamic Quality, we are free. This does not tranlate into
freewill is Quality, however. Choosing is a static quality decision
bound up within social and intellectual (cultural) constraints. Having
to choose does not translate into free will.
John:
> You have to choose caring, if you want life, but many people don't
> particulary care about life, and they don't choose to care, nor do they
> choose to believe in a cosmos where choice is possible. That's their choice
> and they can't be argued out of it because it's a choice deeper than
> intellect.
Dan:
You mean it is a social choice? I am not sure I follow.
>John:
> So I am setting up a "predetermined precondition for caring" - choice.
> Choice is the predetermined precondition for caring. Choice is
> co-fundamental with Quality. That's my point. I think it agrees with RMP,
> because he took the realization of Choice as solved by the MoQ, and I don't
> know if he means in exactly the same way I'm describing, but I believe it
> does prove a solution so I pretty much agree there.
Dan:
Okay. I can go along with this. Both free will and determinism are
seen as correct within the MOQ.
Thank you for caring,
Dan
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list