[MD] The first division of the MOQ. - dynamic or Dynamic Quality?

[David Harding]

Hi Ian,

> Pirsig spends a long time on Art / Rta / Crafts etc ... so you can't
> reduce it to a single either or. There is no "it". That would be
> reductionist.

What is wrong with reductionism? 

> Is art DQ or isn't it ? (As I said already, art is full of both kinds
> of patterns - but the essential experience that distinguish the
> artistic from non-artistic is clearly DQ.)

Is Dynamic Quality a pattern?

> "dynamic" is clearly not the same as "Dynamic Quality" - one is
> natural language one is an undefined split in some undefinable
> metaphysical monad - sq is the defined part. I'm not the one trying to
> define the undefinable.
> 
> I live the undefinable.
> Ian

Okay. But can you please define your answers to the above two questions of mine? :-)