[MD] MOQ and Completeness Theories (Sorry, Godel.)

David Thomas combinedefforts at earthlink.net
Wed Apr 6 19:05:01 PDT 2011


On 4/6/11 3:23 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> Bobhism has been around for a long time, since about 600 AD.
[Dave]
So for you, Bob is Buddha incarnate. Sweet...........

> The early Zen Buddhists did not want people following scripture, or
> praying to idols or other people.
[Dave]
"Bobhism" is to Buddhism as Mormon is to Christian. Religions one and all
however.

> That was an extreme anathema and
> demonstrated that such deciples were misled and caught up in words.
> Living in Quality has no words, it can't.  We do not have enough time
> while we are in the present moment.  Having said this, speaking is
> dynamic quality in action.  This is not a paradox, it simply points to
> dynamic quality.  Dynamic Quality is right now.
[Dave]
Oh, just go on and say it, Bob would've if he could've, "DQ IS GOD!", minus
the fuzzy white beard of course.
An individual personal God that is "just what you like", minus the "just" of
course. All you need is the will to believe.

Analogically speaking
Dave





More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list