[MD] MOQ and Completeness Theories (Sorry, Godel.)
Dan Glover
daneglover at gmail.com
Wed Apr 6 21:48:33 PDT 2011
Hello everyone
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 10:33 AM, David Thomas
<combinedefforts at earthlink.net> wrote:
> Dan
>
>> Armchair quarterbacking again, David?
>
> [Dave]
>
> Again? Still would be more like it, and quarterback, even of the armchair
> type, is way, way, above my pay grade. I'm often not sure what game is
> being played, let alone what side the players are on, what positions they
> play or even if there are positions. Other than the "Fuck Your Buddy" kind
> of course.
Hi Dave
Yeah, me neither. Kind of fun to play though, at times...
>Dave:
> More and more my thinking is in the vein of, "So this is how religions
> emerge and develop?" "Bobhism?" Understand there is a proposal before the
> elders that all temples must be converted old, worn out motorcycle repair
> shops. Preferably specializing in obscure brands or models that never were
> widely popular but that had fanatical fans. So hang in there you may be
> holding onto a gold mine ;-)
Dan:
Hey, one never knows. If that ever comes about, by golly, I'll be part
of that 1%. But I'm pretty sure I'd spend it most of it on wine and
women. And the rest, I'd just waste.
Thanks again,
Dan
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list