[MD] [Bulk] Re: MOQ and Completeness Theories (Sorry, Godel.)

[MarshaV]

Spring has sprung,

The Grass has riz,

I wonder where the Arlo is?   




On Apr 7, 2011, at 9:24 PM, Frank Booth wrote:

> A couple of points and a few sub-points to boot:
> 
> 1) It is not "oops". It is ( OOPS! ).
> 
> 1a) Optionally it may be ( WHOOPS! ).
> 
> 1b) You may check the archives if you do not believe me.
> 
> 1c) You may not steal my line without permission.
> 
> 2) Stop checking the archives. Shake the dust from your eyebrows. Spring is here 
> and life is to be had.
> 
> ~Frank
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: ARLO J BENSINGER JR <ajb102 at psu.edu>
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Sent: Fri, April 1, 2011 4:45:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [MD] [Bulk] Re: MOQ and Completeness Theories (Sorry, Godel.)
> 
> [Arlo]
> No, this is a verbatim quote from my email archives of a post you made to the
> list. There is no "oops", well, maybe in your denying you said this, but anyone
> with half a brain can search the archives and find it.
> 
> [Arlo adds]
> Marsha has brought to my intention that I am wrong, that is this a quote of
> Mark's. I apologize, as I was reading the archives all the embedded >>>> lost
> track of who was saying what.
> 
> Of course, maybe I should just say that its my "interpretation" that Marsha
> said this, and this is just as valid as her "interpretation" that she did not. 
> 
> Who is anyone else to force "static constraints" on me, you want to kill
> Dynamic Quality, don't you?
> 
> Arlo the Less-Than-Half-Brained.
> 
> 
> 



___