[MD] The first division of the MOQ. - dynamic or Dynamic Quality?

[Ian Glendinning]

DMB,
I know, but that's about you and your position.

My position is consistent and clearly context dependent.

Ian
What's so funny 'bout ...

On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:35 PM, david buchanan <dmbuchanan at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Ian said to dmb:
>
> Yes, I do, [think reductionism is the epitome of amoral scientific objectivity] which is why the point you snipped was followed (and preceded) by several buts and conditions ...
>
>
> dmb says:
> Yea, I certainly noticed your buts and conditions. But surely you realize by now that I really, really hate that kind of equivocation. You're not being subtle or nuanced, which would be fine. You're just being a wishy-washy weasel. What don't you take a position and stick to it, for once. Your efforts to be on every side of every issue does not help at all. It's drivel. It's far more egotistical than intellectual and in fact it almost always confuses and blurs whatever the topic or issue is.
> Sorry, but that's how I feel. I just hate it. How many years have I been complaining about that, Ian? Not hours, days, weeks or months. Years. WTF?
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>