[MD] The first division of the MOQ. - dynamic or Dynamic Quality?
Ian Glendinning
ian.glendinning at gmail.com
Sat Apr 9 08:11:59 PDT 2011
Understood, thaks Ron
I am as decisive as the next person in context - I just can't reduce
reductionism to a no-no for all time ever, that would be "prejudice"
as you put it.
There are situations where it is part of the processes of science, but
clearly not all contexts are scientific.
Ian
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 3:56 PM, X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Ian:
>
> Can't argue with that Ron,
> But how did you relate it to the post you responded to ?
>
>
> Ron:
> Dave would like you to exercise more value choices instead of being
> so radical about the discussions, he faults you for not having a developed
> set of value prejudices.
>
> It is a great case in point to what we talk about.
>
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list