[MD] freewill

[MarshaV]

Jan,

Words on a page, or spoken may be very important and wise, but more so 
if accompanied by insight.  -  But you haven't said anything and left the entire 
suggestion for interpretation and projection.  


Marsha





On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:27 AM, Jan-Anders wrote:

> Hi Marsha
> 
> Upon your last statement below.
> 
> J-A
> 
>> Message: 2
>> Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 13:57:37 -0400
>> From: MarshaV<valkyr at att.net>
>> To:moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>> Subject: Re: [MD] freewill
>> Message-ID:<92012904-93DF-4979-ACDA-C5BB2393F9D6 at att.net>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Jan-Anders,
>> 
>> On what basis do you ask the question?
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:39 PM, Jan-Anders wrote:
>> 
>>> >  Hi Marsha
>>> >  >  Have you ever considered studying Boris Vian? He founded something he called Pataphysics which is related to Metaphysics as Metaphysics is related to Physics.
>>> >  >  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boris_Vian
>>> >  >  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%27Pataphysics
>>> >  >  Best
>>> >  >  Jan-Anders
>>> >  >  moq_discuss-request at lists.moqtalk.org  skrev 2011-04-11 19.16:
>>>> >>  Message: 2
>>>> >>  Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:32:16 -0400
>>>> >>  From: MarshaV<valkyr at att.net>
>>>> >>  To:moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>>>> >>  Subject: Re: [MD] freewill
>>>> >>  Message-ID:<29C7EB62-29B7-4F23-A11C-064C85570BA4 at att.net>
>>>> >>  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>>> >>  >>  >>  On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Arlo Bensinger wrote:
>>>> >>  
>>>>>> >>>  >    [Marsha]
>>>>>> >>>  >    Me, you and Pirsig are a fiction.
>>>>>> >>>  >    >   [Arlo]
>>>>>> >>>  >    Okay. Is The MOQ a fiction as well? Should we take something more seriously if "The MOQ" says it, than if "Pirsig" says it?
>>>> >>  Marsha:
>>>> >>  The MoQ is an intellectual static pattern of value.  A very good one, a keeper.  The inherently existing self does collapse on examination.  While a collection of static patterns of value from all four levels, Mr. Pirsig is a very good collection, also a keeper.   Personally I'm a negative empiricist and a radical skeptic, I'd always have to investigate for myself no matter what's been said by whom, whether God, President, Mr. Pirsig or the Beatles.    So far, it has all ultimately come down to not this, not that.
> 



 
___