[MD] Freedom from choice
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Thu Apr 14 05:16:30 PDT 2011
DQ is the fundamental nature of sq. There's no
choice involved.
On Apr 14, 2011, at 7:55 AM, X Acto wrote:
> but thats the choice you make
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
> Sent: Thu, April 14, 2011 4:52:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [MD] Freedom from choice
>
>
>
> Not being an Aristotelian, it is not a matter of choosing either DQ or sq.
> For me sq is not other than DQ. I accept both.
>
>
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2011, at 4:35 PM, X Acto wrote:
>
>> choice
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----
>> From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
>> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>> Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 8:12:48 AM
>> Subject: Re: [MD] Freedom from choice
>>
>>
>>
>> So what is it you have?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 11, 2011, at 7:58 AM, X Acto wrote:
>>
>>> Marsha,
>>> sounds to me like you have a whole lot of nothing.
>>> -Ron
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>> From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
>>> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>>> Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 6:51:56 AM
>>> Subject: Re: [MD] Freedom from choice
>>>
>>>
>>> Ron,
>>>
>>> I have: not this, not that. So what is it you have?
>>>
>>>
>>> Marsha
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 11, 2011, at 6:24 AM, X Acto wrote:
>>>
>>>> Quite right Marsha it's all we have,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> explain that to Dan
>>>>
>>>> wait, no you wont because you are too afraid to disagree with him.
>>>>
>>>> why is that?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>> From: MarshaV <valkyr at att.net>
>>>> To: moq_discuss at moqtalk.org
>>>> Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 6:16:11 AM
>>>> Subject: Re: [MD] Freedom from choice
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ron,
>>>>
>>>> And each step along the way to your "continuity" is
>>>> an act of interpretation, relative to your static history
>>>> and the dynamics of the immediate experience.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Marsha
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 11, 2011, at 5:56 AM, X Acto wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ron:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan,
>>>>>> In my own opinion freedom from choice
>>>>>> is like not taking any responsibility for your
>>>>>> actions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan:
>>>>> I'm sorry, Ron, but this simply doesn't make sense. When we follow
>>>>> static quality patterns we are without choice. That is the ultimate
>>>>> accountability factor, in my opinion. We either do it or we don't
>>>>> survive. So what I see you saying is: I have choices so I do not have
>>>>> to take on the responsibility of doing what is better. I can do what I
>>>>> want. I can drink only single malt whiskey. That is my choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now tell me... how can a person argue with that?
>>>>>
>>>>> Ron:
>>>>> Again you are talking about intellectual patterns
>>>>> and quotes regarding intellectual patterns and applying
>>>>> it as a an arguement against what John and I are saying
>>>>> within the larger context of Quality being value and linking
>>>>> value to choice. I have explained the reasons why I think
>>>>> this is a truer interpretation.
>>>>>
>>>>> You have made the arguement for freedom from choice linked
>>>>> to dynamic Quality and no choice linked to static Quality and
>>>>> you do not understand why I see contradiction in that along
>>>>> with squaring those concepts with the continuity of the remainder
>>>>> of Pirsigs works.
>>>>>
>>>>> You claim that I am not disagreeing with you but with the MoQ
>>>>> there is only one. That means there is only one way to correctly
>>>>> interpret it. How else would you make this claim unless you honostly felt
>> you
>>>>> possesed the interpretation?
>>>>>
>>>>> Basically I think that the idea of the MoQ pointing to freedom from choice
>>>>> is the MoQ pointing to sitting on our ass and doing nothing.
>>>>>
>>>>> Which is not what I get when I read Pirsig.
>>>>>
>>>>> We are argueing two differing interpretations my own and your own.
>>>>> I have rooted my explanation in continuity and you seem to have in
>>>> interpretive
>>>>> legitimacy.
>>>>>
>>>>> So with this in mind,
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan:
>>>>> I'm sorry, Ron, but this simply doesn't make sense. When we follow
>>>>> static quality patterns we are without choice. That is the ultimate
>>>>> accountability factor, in my opinion. We either do it or we don't
>>>>> survive.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ron:
>>>>> I guess what you dont see is that you just offered a choice as your example
>>>>> "do it or don't survive" thats a choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan:
>>>>> So what I see you saying is: I have choices so I do not have
>>>>> to take on the responsibility of doing what is better. I can do what I
>>>>> want. I can drink only single malt whiskey. That is my choice.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ron:
>>>>> No I'm saying since it is all choice, all the way down, we would do well to
>
>>>>> choose
>>>>> in regard to the perpetuating the choices it requires to exist. I'm saying that
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> this is
>>>>> the explanation of the basis of a moral reality I'm saying that existence is
>>
>>
>>>>> nothing
>>>>> but those choices and like you said, the ultimate responsibility, now,,,
>>>>> How does freedom from choice figure into this context of moral
> responsibity?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan:
>>>>> Now tell me... how can a person argue with that?
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list