[MD] Frewill
Joseph Maurer
jhmau at comcast.net
Fri Apr 15 14:44:35 PDT 2011
Hi Mark nd all,
I prefer to see emotions as a level in evolution. Since they are
indefinable, in a DQ/SQ metaphysical division they can only be DQ.
Joe
On 4/13/11 8:49 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Ideas are emotions put to language. This is the impact of the
> societal level on our individual level. We do not put ideas to words
> unless we want to communicate them. This is one of the errors that
> are made in equating so much with static quality. It only becomes
> static when one puts it to words and enters into the social level.
> Otherwise words are not necessary. Most of our thoughts are wordless,
> and as such it is hard to differentiate them from what you call
> emotions.
>
> Only a small fraction of our thoughts are brought to the attention
> level, and this is for societal or communication purposes. Most
> thoughts reside in what you may call emotions. What would you call an
> idea that has no words? Perhaps such a thing does not make sense to
> you, but at least think about it.
>
> I have no problem with your abstraction of the emotional level, but
> perhaps I don't see it the same way that you do. Most ideas are
> emotions. They happen before you place attention on them.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Joseph Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> Ideas are not emotions. To deny the emotional level in evolution DQ/SQ
>> makes definition a metaphysical principle rather than the more comprehensive
>> evolution in existence.
>>
>>
>> On 4/12/11 4:13 PM, "118" <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Joe,
>>> While you are longing DQ, I am living it. Your clown tears streak your
>>> face.
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, April 12, 2011, Joseph Maurer <jhmau at comcast.net> wrote:
>>>> Hi Dan and All
>>>>
>>>> As I read your response to Arlo, I am in tears. The longing for the MOQ
>>>> that is contained within your words is breathtaking. DQ/SQ, the longing is
>>>> DQ, no way to define it. I wish, in some way, that evolution could be
>>>> explored with the same reverence for Pirsig's endeavors.
>>>>
>>>> Joe
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list