[MD] DQ and sq

[118]

Hi John,
I think this a good find.  Maybe not perfect, but all of this is
analogy anyway.  There are some literalists in the forum that place a
lot of importance on words, rather than ideas.  They may object.  I
will try it out.
Mark

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 10:50 AM, John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:
> Past is a static pattern.  As static as they come!  What is more unchanging
> than the past?
>
> But the future?  We use the word to point to something that brings into
> being, but our imagining is never fully the reality we actually experience.
> The future as an idea is one thing, but the future as a thing is too
> mysterious for words, and just like I've always thought of DQ, in every
> way.  What is evolution but the drive toward the future?  Try it.  Go back
> and substitute the concept of the future, for all references to DQ in Lila,
> and show me one that doesn't fit.
>
> It even works better with Jamesian pragmatism - what is the test of the
> good?  Future experience.
>
> John past
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:15 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi John,
>>
>> Time, past and future, are static patterns.
>>
>> http://www.quantonics.com/Anthony_McWatts_MoQ_Paper.html
>>
>> Or try Nagarjuna's MMK.
>>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 19, 2011, at 4:35 PM, John Carl wrote:
>>
>> > So, is DQ just another word for the future?  And sq a term for the past?
>>  Is
>> > that all there is to it after all this time?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>