What do you use it for? On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 8:19 AM, X Acto <xacto at rocketmail.com> wrote: > To say that DQ is strictly nonconceptual is to say that DQ is strictly > meaningless > and does not explain anything. It is rendered useless. > Andre: > I am reluctant to 'understand' DQ as 'betterness'. [Mary] > Agree, Andre. Betterness is a static pattern of value.