[MD] Free Will

[David Harding]

Hi Everyone,

I'll chime in here and say that I think betterness can be both in and out of context just as it can be defined and undefined.


On 23/04/2011, at 3:09 AM, John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yup, I'd say so Mary.  Betterness is always in context and all static
> patterns arise due to the realization that its better that they should be
> construed as patterns out of the undifferentiated continuum.
> 
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Mary <marysonthego at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Isn't betterness always in context?
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:49 PM, John Carl <ridgecoyote at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Disagree, Mary.
>>> 
>>> Betterness is not due to static patterns.
>>> 
>>> Perception of any Static patterns of value is due to betterness.
>>> 
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html