[MD] Free Will

[MarshaV]

Hi Mark,

I certainly would not want to be understood as supporting logical 
anarchy, chaos or nihilism, but nor do I believe things are necessarily 
'this OR that.'   Even with the hindsight of history, there might be 
disagreement concerning meaningfulness.  


Marsha




On Apr 24, 2011, at 12:25 PM, 118 wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> Certainly meaningfulness in the moment can be subjective.  There are
> cases, however, where certain meaningfulness is supported through
> subsequent history.  We could then state that it is possible that one
> thing is more meaningful than another in that context, and in fact
> have its roots in the moment.  Otherwise meaningfulness becomes
> meaningless.  And we don't want that kind of nihilism in this forum.
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 12:38 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> On Apr 24, 2011, at 3:14 AM, X Acto wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> Ron:
>>> I'm sorry Dan but you do need to explain yourself if you care about any sort of
>>> meaningful philosophic discussion.
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> Most philosophic discussions are based on disagreement.  And "meaningful"
>> is in the eyes of the beholder.  Also what is 'acceptable explanation' is another
>> relative matter.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___




___