[MD] Free Will
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Sun Apr 24 11:35:50 PDT 2011
Hi Mark,
What do you mean by Intellectual Level? How do you define it?
By purpose? by function? Or something else?
I wonder if we can imagine beyond the "intellectual level"?
Marsha
On Apr 24, 2011, at 1:47 PM, 118 wrote:
> Hi Marsha,
> Certainly everything is open to healthy and meaningful rhetoric
> debate. One must admit, however, that there are certain philosophies
> that rise to the popular top. I can only hope that MoQ becomes one of
> these. In previous posts I have analogized these to rogue waves.
> There is no way to dismiss these phenomena with logic, psychology,
> sociology, or mathematics (all intellectual constructs).
>
> For example, take the Axial Age as presented by Karl Jaspers. There
> was a sudden increase in personal philosophy during this age. A
> transformation of popular questioning of that inside rather than that
> outside. This was personified by thinkers such as Buddha, Lao Tzu,
> Socrates, and many others. In our current age, we have gone back to
> that outside, with philosophies such as Scientism. Such is the
> circular nature of beliefs.
>
> Some consider this Axial Age to be an intervention of sorts. This
> could have cycles of 2,500 years or so, if one wants to subscribe to
> this theory. I am fine with this since it can be the intellectual
> level asserting itself into the personal and then societal levels.
> Others subscribe to other things such as alien or spiritual
> intervention. I find the former more believable. Many books have
> been written about such things, of course.
>
> This OR That can be useful for meaningful discussion. If we slide
> into the unity of all, which could be considered the pre-intellectual
> level (or maybe an expression of the right brain), it puts our
> intellect in a bad light (imho). I think the intellect, although
> wrought with problems and possible misdirection, gives us meaning and
> provides much of the societal level as well. Buddha believed highly
> of the intellectual level. Jesus subscribed more to the intuitive
> (pre-intellectual) level. Each one may be describing the same thing,
> just in different ways.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 10:06 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> I certainly would not want to be understood as supporting logical
>> anarchy, chaos or nihilism, but nor do I believe things are necessarily
>> 'this OR that.' Even with the hindsight of history, there might be
>> disagreement concerning meaningfulness.
>>
>>
>> Marsha
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 24, 2011, at 12:25 PM, 118 wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Marsha,
>>> Certainly meaningfulness in the moment can be subjective. There are
>>> cases, however, where certain meaningfulness is supported through
>>> subsequent history. We could then state that it is possible that one
>>> thing is more meaningful than another in that context, and in fact
>>> have its roots in the moment. Otherwise meaningfulness becomes
>>> meaningless. And we don't want that kind of nihilism in this forum.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 12:38 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 24, 2011, at 3:14 AM, X Acto wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ron:
>>>>> I'm sorry Dan but you do need to explain yourself if you care about any sort of
>>>>> meaningful philosophic discussion.
>>>>
>>>> Marsha:
>>>> Most philosophic discussions are based on disagreement. And "meaningful"
>>>> is in the eyes of the beholder. Also what is 'acceptable explanation' is another
>>>> relative matter.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>>
>>
>> Moq_Discuss mailing list
>> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
>> Archives:
>> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
>> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list