[MD] [Bulk] Re: the story of "me"

[David Harding]

Hi Dan,

> Dan:
> That is what Herrigal had such a difficult time with. Remember how he
> practiced and practiced his archery while on hiatus from his lessons?
> And when he returned to the master and shot what he thought was a
> perfect shot? And how the master responded by immediately dropping him
> from his teachings?
> 
> Herrigal was trying to shoot rather than just shooting. To experience
> Dynamic Quality, just experience. The sense of how it happens is a
> static quality pattern that occurs later. So to try and talk about it
> is to make the same mistake Herrigal made in trying to shoot rather
> than just shooting.

I agree Dan, but why talk about it at all? Aren't you now using 'static patterns which occur later' to talk about it? All talk of Dynamic Quality is just that - static, and so by the very nature of static quality, some talking which points to Dynamic Quality is better than other talking. 

Therefore, Dan, my question still stands - From an MOQ perspective how did both the Mathematician and the Zen Archer experience Dynamic Quality?

> 
>> David:
>> How did the Mathematician and Zen Archer experience Dynamic Quality?
> 
> Dan:
> 
> They just experienced. Dynamic Quality is synonymous with experience.
> There is no separation until we ask: how?

I agree, but this doesn't  explain how they experienced Dynamic Quality.

As Ron asks: 'Where does the Dynamic Quality come from if there is nothing but static patterns?'

I think this is a source of confusion for many.  Simply saying "by not asking how - you can experience Dynamic Quality" doesn't answer Ron's question. 

What is the 'link' between Dynamic Quality and static quality. How does Dynamic Quality 'appear'?