[MD] Free Will

[118]

Hi Marsha,
Thanks for the interaction, I certainly learned a lot.  And, thanks
for that last math equation, Ham will be proud.

Cheerio,
Mark

On Thursday, April 28, 2011, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> Hello Mark,
>
> On Apr 28, 2011, at 1:43 AM, 118 wrote:
>
>>
>>> Marsha:
>>> I'm sticking with DQ as "indivisible, undefinable and unknowable".  -  I do
>>> think one should be able to explain how to recognize an intellectual
>>> static pattern of value.  To assign 'science' as an intellectual pattern
>>> explains nothing.  'Science' and 'zero,'  are names, not patterns.
>>>
>> [Mark]
>> OK
>>>
>>>
>>> Marsha"
>>> "providing guidance' sounds like 'intention.'   What I mean by function is
>>> more about how it behaves: abstracts, isolates, reifies to know and manipulate.
>>
>> [Mark]
>> Yeah, that is why I have difficulty ascribing function to DQ.  We can
>> certainly see how the intellectual level behaves in hind-sight.  I
>> don't think that level abstracts, it is abstraction.
>>
>> How about if we analogize the intellectual level to a movie on the
>> screen.  This process has several parts.  The movie (in days of old)
>> is on a film which has light passed through it, the light carries the
>> information and hits a screen where what was once light is now broken
>> up into all sorts of static patterns.  Which part do you think could
>> be the intellectual level?
>
>
> Marsha:
> Most generally, the intellectual level would be the part that is opposite-from-non-(intellectual level).  And your analogy and my response signals the end of further discussion.
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>