[MD] Thinking

[MarshaV]

H Mark,

I suppose I am picking nits in a way that matters to no one else, but I need to drop both causality and connectedness which seem both to require some intrinsic nature.  At the moment I like better 'conditionally co-dependent'.  


Marsha 





On Aug 6, 2011, at 12:15 PM, MarshaV wrote:

> 
> Mark,  
> 
> 
> Simply causal?  I still could wonder how anything that lacks intrinsic nature could possibly causally connect?  What kind of connection would that be?   MMK - Chapter One kind of question...  
> 
> 
> Marsha 
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 6, 2011, at 11:47 AM, 118 wrote:
> 
>> This is simply a causal connection.  As such it goes from undifferentiated (Quality) to highly differentiated (language).  Please note that language results in perceived Quality.
>> 
>> Mark
>> 
>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 1:21 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Of course, I could wonder how anything that lacks intrinsic nature could possibly connect?  What kind of connection would that be?  (I can hear my mother's words:  "Marsha, you think too much!")   Undifferentiated, and non-rational, and free from assimilation, discrimination, analysis and synthesis?   Or seeing without anything seen?   
>>> 
>>> Boggles the thinking mind...   
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Aug 5, 2011, at 3:56 AM, MarshaV wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi Mark,
>>>> 
>>>> Interconnected?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Marsha  
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Aug 4, 2011, at 3:52 PM, 118 wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> There is a way to make this, understandable.  Language results from thinking, thinking results from awareness, awareness results from dualism, dualism results from quality, quality results from Quality, Quality results from language.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Mark
>>>> 


 
___