[MD] Moral Responsibility without free will corrected

[MarshaV]

On Aug 9, 2011, at 1:56 PM, david buchanan wrote:

> 
> Marsha said to dmb,
> 
> Your claim to 'free will' is by right of static, convention only. I am interested in the MoQ, NOT Contemporary Pragmatism, as such I am not interested in what dmb says that Charlene says that James says.  
> 
> 
> 
> dmb says:
> Nope. You're quite mistaken on both accounts. Free will refers to concrete experience or DQ and I'm using James to explain the MOQ. Clearly, you missed the point.



Marsha:
IMHO, it is the MoQ that can be used to improve Jamesian philosophy.  -  Needless to say, I will continue to read your posts.  I appreciate your enthusiasm for the James.   Maybe some day I will become more interested.  



 
___