[MD] Quality in the Balance, Part 1: Semantics
118
ununoctiums at gmail.com
Tue Aug 9 12:39:47 PDT 2011
Hi Mike,
You mean Bezerkly? My brother went there in the '70s, you have never
seen more displaced people looking for a cause. No more sex, love,
and rock'n roll. Guns anyone?
Hasn't changed from what I gather from my nephew who lives in The
City. Lots of rich, lots of poor, and now lot's of traffic.
I spent a weekend in the Redwoods last week in a place called The
Bohemian Grove. There was lots of deal making, political coniving,
and sacrifices going on there. A fun place to go and relax
nontheless. I think that it is the abundance of oxygen.
Mark
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Michael R. Brown <mrb at fuguewriter.com> wrote:
> Hi, 118 -
>
>>>> Quality does not have an antonym.
>>
>> How about the Buddhist "Dukkha"?
>> Yes I agree, this is a suitable antonym for our use of the word Quality.
>
> Brings to mind the title of a positive review of ZAMM: "Good ride."
>
>> the concept of "suffering" is a Western and Christian interpretation of
>> Buddhism
>
> Yes! Almost a Puritan, or highly moralistic, approach. A terrible trouble
> for American Buddhism. Here's a book I like:
> http://www.amazon.com/Lust-Enlightenment-Buddhism-John-Stevens/dp/087773416X
> - all about Buddhism and sex. Delightfully liberating. I think it may be
> banned in Berkeley!
>
>
> MRB
> http://www.fuguewriter.com
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list