[MD] [Bulk] Re: Moral Responsibility without free will

[Andre Broersen]

Marsha to Andre:

Don't feel sorry for me.  I'm not the one whining that I won't play by
YOUR rules.  You're like a tattlle-tale:

	 "Mommy!  Marsha won't play by MY rules.  She said this
	   and that.  Waaaaaa.  Make her stop..."


Whatever...

Andre:
Now I really do feel sorry for you. You have lost your way. You do not know what you are talking about. You have no understanding of anything you use in your responses to other posts where you try to make a point of I do not know what. And have questioned you about those for an explanation.

They are NOT my rules. YOU use Buddhist insights/rules to explore the MOQ (to use YOUR words). YOU have used Garfield and Nagarjuna and citations from Anthony's PhD to paralyse anyone's posts here on this MD, especially dmb's.

And to make what point???

I have shown that you do not understand what you are talking about in using these references. In fact, I have shown that you are MISREPRESENTING what these references are saying.

To now respond in the way you are is truly pathetic Marsha. I did not set the parameters. I did not set the rules. I did not set it in that (Buddhist) context. YOU did. All by yourself and it has backfired right in your face. To deny this and blame it on not playing by my rules is intellectual dishonesty at base level.

It is projection of the worst kind and does not belong on a philosophical discussion forum.

Only the eel in the proverbial bucket would respond the way you do.

You still do not own up.

Very, very sad indeed.

Delete.