[MD] Moral Responsibility without free will

[John Carl]

Hi Marsha,

Good question.  I think questions like this lead to insight.  I know your
question led to my insight, just posted, that free will indicates a 4th
level transcendance over merely following  moral rules because everybody
else does.

I liked what Mark said about our "free won't".  Which sorta resonates with
my post about love and doubt.

Take care and keep asking those questions and exercising your free won't.

John




On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:30 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

> Another question:
>
> The MoQ offers a four-tiered, evolutionary, hierarchical structure as a
> moral framework.  In what way does this translate into a logical and
> necessary relationship between an agent with free will and moral
> responsibility?
>
>
>
> On Aug 8, 2011, at 10:57 AM, MarshaV wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Is there a difference between the law holding someone responsible &
> protecting citizens from further harm and a individual being "morally
> responsible"?  Just a question...
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>