[MD] Thinking: DQ/sq

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Marsha,

Dq is indefinable.  This sets it apart from mathematical computation.  A
defined 1 cannot describe individuality.  This places the burden for
decision making on the individual making possible the exploration of an
indefinable/definable principle of metaphysics placing the burden of
responsibility for the judgment for actions on the individual.

In DQ/SQ the individual is a different concept from mathematical 1, hence
the logic is different, and the mystical DQ/SQ is more real than the logical
DQ/SQ.  The certainty of the reality of DQ is explored in individuality,
freewill, not determined in conceptual attribution.  In that way DQ is
indefinable.  Laws are made to be broken in further evolution, and judgment
is always necessary Imho.

Joe


On 8/11/11 1:40 PM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:

> 
> Hi Joe,
> 
> Mr. Pirsig stated it was unknowable, as well as indivisible and
> undefinable.  That would be no-thing to know and no one to
> know it.  As Dan said, it is best explained as what it is not.
>  
>  
> Marsha 
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 11, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Joseph Maurer wrote:
> 
>> Hi Marsha,
>> 
>> The word "unknowable" seems out of place in describing DQ, since it is a
>> principle in metaphysics.  This which would make metaphysics a dream
>> sequence.  Where's the meat?
>> 
>> Joe
>> 
>> On 8/10/11 11:54 PM, "MarshaV" <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> Dynamic Quality is indivisible, undefinable and unknowable.
>> 
> 
> 
>  
> ___
>  
> 
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html