[MD] Quality in the Balance, Part 3: in the

[Michael R. Brown]

Hi, David Thomas -

> If you wish I'll send one to you privately.

It would be a pleasure. I'll send you one of my books if you like.

> But lately my take on the emergence of the layers in time at the social 
> and intellectual level viz latest science leads me to believe that this 
> structure is at best untenable and maybe flat wrong.

As I've said before, I'm strongly sympathetic to evolutionary psychology. 
In light of this, let’s say some really good science comes up with something 
that goes against the MOQ or some principle or picture of things Bob holds 
dear. Is there a concern that it might all come tumbling down from the least 
thing? [That's one reason I like to approach very intellectual, INTJ (Myers 
Briggs) things from an emotional center. As Nietzsche said, the 
philosophers' systems all disagree - but their personalities are immortal 
and irrefutable. That's why I like to play with the idea that the MOQ is a 
fiction. He does defend the Sophists, after all!


MRB
http://www.fuguewriter.com