[MD] self: agent of action & thinker of thoughts

[Joseph Maurer]

Hi Ham and All,

DQ, indefinable levels in existence, evolution, makes sense to me, a base
for a moral hierarchy.

Is evolution a meaningless word?  Your use of the word "morality", on a
site exploring the meaning of DQ/SQ indicates to me a decisive judgment for
good or bad behavior without indicating the metaphysical basis for judgment
beyond an acceptance in faith.

Imho "Moral" value tied to evolution for value-sensibility is a judgment,
beyond the Yes or No of SOM.  DQ, indefinable, is the arbiter for sense or
nonsense in an individual.  SQ, defined, is the judgment.

Joe


On 8/17/11 12:56 PM, "Ham Priday" <hampday1 at verizon.net> wrote:
<snip>
> Yes, progress is being made even as we speak.  As I've said before, morality
> is a human precept, which means that value-sensibility is prerequisite for
> moral judgment.  This precept "doesn't quite fit" the MoQ paradigm which
> posits Value (Quality) as a universal truth or principle.
<snip>