[MD] The Relativist's journey

[MarshaV]

Hi Mark,
 
On Dec 1, 2011, at 2:41 PM, 118 wrote:

> Hello Marsha,
> 
> On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 10:52 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> Greetings Mark,
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>> On Dec 1, 2011, at 12:51 AM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Mark:
>>> What I was trying to say about quantum mechanics is that it is a
>>> mathematical description of matter.  The notion that matter is
>>> non-local arises from how the math is used.  Therefore non-locality is
>>> not a result of matter actually being non-local, it is a result of the
>>> math used to describe it.  The problem with physicists (imo) is that
>>> they think that the math equations actually ARE matter.
>> 
>> Marsha:
>> Patterns are ever-changing, conditionally codependent, impermanent and conceptually constructed, whether intellectual, social, biological or inorganic. Within the quantum world, there is the measurement problem.  And hope for interconnectedness.
> 
> [Mark]
> As you know, I have a problem with "patterns" since it seem to rigid
> for me.  In my opinion, patterns arise after conceptualization.  This
> would draw a line between DQ and conceptualization, which I do not
> believe is quite accurate.  But, that is just me.
> 

Marsha: 
Here is my understanding of patterns.  Please note, though I state 
that all patterns are conceptualized, that does not mean that patterns 
are conceptual (all concepts).  For I do not.  Patterns may very well, 
at the very least, have a perceptual piece.  Here it is again: 

I think it best to consider static patterns of value from two different 
points of view.  One would be the nature of all patterns:  conditionally 
co-dependent, impermanent, ever-changing and conceptualized.  
A second would be by categorization by evolutionary function - 
inorganic, biological, social and intellectual – into their four-level, 
hierarchical structure. 
  
 
___