[MD] emptiness

[MarshaV]

Mark,

See my response to Ham.  Beyond that, your questions do not make sense to me, so I don't know.


Marsha




Sent from my iPad

On Dec 22, 2011, at 3:19 PM, 118 <ununoctiums at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> Yes, I am aware that such is the way you see.  But, what is your
> point?  How does your vision help explain and further characterize the
> Metaphysics of Quality?  If you truly see that what you present is an
> analogy, then what lies below the analogy (besides another analogy).
> I could say the world is cheese (as an analogy), and if asked, I could
> say that the analogy I present is simply an analogy which is made up
> of analogies.  Would this explain what I mean?  For what reason do you
> like to use the concept of "patterns"?
> 
> How is it that your presentation of all as analogy on analogy work in
> favor of MoQ?  I don't care if people of importance have said the
> same.  Feel free to present any quote from Pirsig to answer this.
> Also, if you could, please present your interpretation of such quote,
> in that way I can understand why your specifically provide it.
> Perhaps it is not your intention to support your belief system on MoQ
> discuss; I have no opinion on that either negative or positive.  If
> you choose not to answer these questions, I can respect that.
> 
> There you go, questions without criticism.   I cannot find anything to
> criticize in what you present.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mark
> 
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 3:29 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Mark,
>> 
>> I see patterns, of which words and definitions are an aspect, to all be analogy for conventional-habitual experience.
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPad
>> 
>>