[MD] Quality and the Higgs Field: An Analogy

[MarshaV]

Hi Mark,

I'm lateral drifting and painting, but couldn't resist wondering.  If patterns 
are in a constant state of flux and do not have an inherent essence, on 
what basis would one make a comparison?  
 
Marsha  
 
 

On Feb 1, 2011, at 2:21 PM, 118 wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> I imagine this is a suggestion rather than a question.  Quality as
> creating difference as opposed to resulting from difference is a
> perspective which provides a metaphysics.  Keep in mind that such a
> view is not an absolute or a Truth.  Such a view requires a
> comparative approach.  Certainly conceptual patterns of expectation
> can be a tool in this approach, in my opinion.
> 
> If such patterns point to Quality, then they are useful for describing
> the impact of Quality.  To say they are synonyms, is using the tool to
> describe itself.  The teleology may be a bit too direct to make this
> useful.  However, it may provide meaning if you elaborate on what you
> mean.
> 
> Certainly if we are expecting to be aware of Quality, it is easier to
> sense intellectually.  I must assume that most of our quality does not
> reach the intellectual.  Quality is also a driving influence.  It
> creates choices.
> 
> Thanks for the input,
> Mark
> 
> On Monday, January 31, 2011, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> How about difference as conceptual patterns of expectation?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 31, 2011, at 6:26 PM, Ham Priday wrote:
>> 
>>> difference
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___



 
___