[MD] Quality and the Higgs Field: An Analogy

[MarshaV]

Hi Mark,

No complications at all.  Just different ways of interpreting.

Thanks for responding.



Marsha  



On Feb 1, 2011, at 5:28 PM, 118 wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> If you see quality, you are making a comparison.  Things do not need
> an inherent essence for that, ideas can bring forth seeing quality.  I
> suppose you see quality in the view of a constant state of flux.  You
> are comparing that to an alternative view, otherwise you wouldn't
> bring it up.  The quality is what separates it from what you are
> trying to run from.  The basis is the two (or more) things you are
> comparing, what creates the difference is Quality.  Not that
> complicated, Huh?
> 
> Mark
> 
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:23 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Mark,
>> 
>> I'm lateral drifting and painting, but couldn't resist wondering.  If patterns
>> are in a constant state of flux and do not have an inherent essence, on
>> what basis would one make a comparison?
>> 
>> Marsha
>> 
>>