[MD] X = no-self

[MarshaV]

On Jan 4, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Arlo Bensinger wrote:

> You labeled your post "X = no-self", and then signed it "Marsha"...

Used conventionally.   


> You then said, "Xxxx s a collection of ever-changing...", and yet as far back as I can see you signed your posts with "Marsha"... Continuity?

Marsha is a conventional label.  


> You then say "If you haven't figured that out yet, you do not have an iota of MoQ understanding"... I'd say there are many ways people demonstrate a lack of "MOQ understanding"...

You are correct.   


> You conclude, "To those who would call me angel or asshole, know that that name-calling is a reflection of your own patterns"... I thought everything was interdependent? Seems it would be a reflection of both the caller and the callee...

No Arlo, not if the callee is a collection of ever-changing, interdependent, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual static patterns of value entangled within a field of DQ.  To what would such a label attach?

What do you think the 'self' is within the MoQ?  You might check your copy of the MoQ Textbook.   



 
___