[MD] X = no-self
MarshaV
valkyr at att.net
Tue Jan 4 07:36:48 PST 2011
On Jan 4, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Arlo Bensinger wrote:
> [Marsha]
> Used conventionally.
>
> [Arlo]
> Why? Why do you insist on the continuity?
Marsha:
I do not insist. Would 'continuity' represent a pattern of habit? Recently Ron addressed me as Lucy; I responded. My mother called me Motz which was to stand for marzipan.
> [Marsha]
> Marsha is a conventional label.
>
> [Arlo]
> Why follow convention? What's the purpose?
Marsha:
I would prefer not to confuse you.
> [Marsha]
> No Arlo, not if the callee is a collection of ever-changing, interdependent, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual static patterns of value entangled within a field of DQ.
>
> [Arlo]
> If all patterns are interconnected, the "callee" is not independent of the "caller", so any interaction is mutually dependent.
Marsha:
Doesn't mean they are equally interconnected. - I never stated "mutually dependent." Are you going to start playing sophistry?
> [Marsha]
> To what would such a label attach?
>
> [Arlo]
> To whatever is the continuity you insist upon by signing all your posts "Marsha".
Marsha:
There is no continuity other than label.
___
More information about the Moq_Discuss
mailing list