[MD] X = no-self

MarshaV valkyr at att.net
Tue Jan 4 07:36:48 PST 2011


On Jan 4, 2011, at 10:12 AM, Arlo Bensinger wrote:

> [Marsha]
> Used conventionally.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Why? Why do you insist on the continuity?

Marsha:
I do not insist.  Would 'continuity' represent a pattern of habit?   Recently Ron addressed me as Lucy; I responded.  My mother called me Motz which was to stand for marzipan.  


> [Marsha]
> Marsha is a conventional label.
> 
> [Arlo]
> Why follow convention? What's the purpose?

Marsha:
I would prefer not to confuse you.    


> [Marsha]
> No Arlo, not if the callee is a collection of ever-changing, interdependent, inorganic, biological, social and intellectual static patterns of value entangled within a field of DQ.
> 
> [Arlo]
> If all patterns are interconnected, the "callee" is not independent of the "caller", so any interaction is mutually dependent.

Marsha:
Doesn't mean they are equally interconnected.  -   I never stated "mutually dependent."  Are you going to start playing sophistry?  


> [Marsha]
> To what would such a label attach?
> 
> [Arlo]
> To whatever is the continuity you insist upon by signing all your posts "Marsha".

Marsha:
There is no continuity other than label.  


 
___
 




More information about the Moq_Discuss mailing list