[MD] The Dynamics of Value

[Ham Priday]

Hey there, John --


[Mark, previously]:
> I like the term appearance, however, I am not quite sure why.

> John:  I know why.  "Illusion" means something fake.
> There is a useful semantic distinction between what we mean
> by illusion vs. what we mean by reality.  In a subject-oriented
> metaphysic, there is no functional difference between the two,
> but when the spectre of intersubjective disagreement raises its
> ugly head, the difference becomes plain.  Reality is that upon
> which we find easy agreement.

What does the term "intersubjective" add to disagreement?  Aren't all 
disagreements between two or more individuals?

And if "Reality is that upon which we find easy agreement," why do we have 
so much difficulty defining what it is?

Finally, you and I parted in an "agreement to disagree" some months ago. 
Where do you currently stand on the issue of a primary source?  Or do you 
consider yourself a practicing Buddhist?

Essentially curious,
Ham