[MD] all that is opposite-from-non-pattern

[118]

Hi Marsha,
This "pattern" stuff that you speak of does not make much sense to me.
 Isn't non-pattern a pattern?
Inquisitively yours,
Mark

On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:55 AM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>
> On Jun 28, 2011, at 9:55 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson wrote:
>
>> Hello Marsha
>>
>> Thanks for your humble answer.
>>
>> 28 jun 2011 kl. 15.41 Marsho wrote:
>>
>>> On Jun 28, 2011, at 1:40 AM, Jan-Anders Andersson wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Marsha
>>>>
>>>> 27 jun 2011 kl. 18.44 sMarsha wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Not to be repeating myself, I neither accept the notion of freewill, nor reject it.  Same goes with determinism and causation.  I accept that these are conventional (static) notions, but not Ultimately real.  While living within a conventional culture it seems wise to sustain social and biological patterns whenever necessary for one will be held responsible to that level's "moral" code (laws and punishment. )
>>>>
>>>> Even if you neither accept nor reject it. I really would like to understand what you mean with "The notion of Free Will". Please.
>>>>
>>>> Jan-Anders
>>>
>>>
>>> Marsha,
>>>
>>> It means whatever it conventional means.  What is the meaning of the pattern named Justice?  How would you describe its meaning?  How would you describe the meaning of any pattern.   I understand static patterns to represent a collection of interdependent, ever-changing particular momentary events (process) which constantly change as they arise, abide and pass away: and as they are continually altered by an individual?s static history and the dynamics of the event.  I have mentioned before that I tend also to think of patterns, pattern(x) for instance, to include all-that-is opposite-from-non-pattern(x).  That may include a dictionary definition.  -  The horns of a rabbit might be a static notion or pattern.
>>>
>>> How well do you think you understand my explanation?
>>>
>>>
>>> Marsha
>>
>> Not really sure. You intend to sell a Norwegian Blue Parrot?
>>
>> Try again, please.
>>
>> Jan-Anders
>
>
>
> Jan-Anders,
>
> Within this conventional reality, I tend to think of patterns of value not as fixed or
> frozen or reified, but as events or processes, much more fluid and relational.
> Defining a spov as all that is opposite-from-non-pattern keeps them closer to
> experience in the conventional sense.  imho
>
>
> Marsha
>
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
> Moq_Discuss mailing list
> Listinfo, Unsubscribing etc.
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/listinfo.cgi/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org
> Archives:
> http://lists.moqtalk.org/pipermail/moq_discuss-moqtalk.org/
> http://moq.org/md/archives.html
>