[MD] The Quality of Free Will

[MarshaV]

On Jul 27, 2011, at 12:55 AM, 118 wrote:

> Hi Marsha,
> Your finding Nada may be a function of how you are looking for it.  If
> you use standard Subject/Object metaphysics, then of course you will
> find nothing.  In the same way that Atman cannot be found in that way.
> This is one reason why Pirsig does not like that metaphysics.
> However, if you look beyond that metaphysics, believe me you will find
> it.  Keep hunting, you will see it at at some totally random normal
> time, this is called enlightenment.  There is nothing special about
> finding it.  You will wonder why you didn't see it before since it is
> so simple.  It really does exist.  I cannot help you since you are far
> away.
> 
> Good Luck,
> Mark
> 
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 3:20 PM, MarshaV <valkyr at att.net> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Mark,
>> 
>> It is still speculation and under investigation, but I cannot find anything INHERENTLY existing.  Nada.  And I'm not sure what face of Buddha you think I am aiming for.  What do you think of the witnessing experience?
>> 
>> 
>> Marsha
> 


Hi Mark,

Far away, which everybody knows is relative, nada & "spiritual rationalism" 
can be found in the Diamond Sutra: neither this, nor that.   It is feminine.  
Lila, in chapter 14, states it clearly.    


Marsha  


 
___